Unless "conspiracy theory" is somehow part of the name of the conspiracy theory, the current title fails the WP:ATDAB policy as it is not covered by any of the listed disambiguation types. " and also doesn't have "conspiracy theory" in its title. That's not really the case, since a very similar conspiracy theory, Qanon, also begins the article with "_ is a conspiracy theory which. There has been a lot of coverage of Pizzagate since the last requested move: With regards to the second issue that was discussed, the "conspiracy theory" descriptor in the title, there was concerns that this was inconsistent with other (cherry-picked) articles and that it somehow implies that the theory is true. I don't think recentism still applies, as promoting Pizzagate has become a very significant and consistently applied label for plenty of people, and many conspiracy theories have been compared to Pizzagate by reliable sources. In the previous discussion, there were mostly two concerns: recentism and not including the "conspiracy theory" label in the title. Now that almost two years have passed, we can better look at any long-term significance this might have. Pizzagate conspiracy theory → Pizzagate – The last discussion, two years ago when this was still recent, concluded with no consensus to move to Pizzagate. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 12:44, 30 September 2018 (UTC) The result of the move request was: No consensus, therefore, not moved.
No further edits should be made to this section. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. The following is a closed discussion of a requested move.
0 kommentar(er)
